ISSN 0046-578X
Vol. 51, Issue 3, 2023July 09, 2023 EDT
Comparative Analysis of How Emerging Arbitration Hubs like South Korea and the U.A.E Compete for Dominance in the International Arena
Comparative Analysis of How Emerging Arbitration Hubs like South Korea and the U.A.E Compete for Dominance in the International Arena
Olha “Olia” Kaliuzhna,
Articles in Vol. 51, Issue 3, 2023
Vol. 51, Issue 3, 2023
- The Possible Worlds of Economic SanctionsJ. Benton Heath
- Economic Statecraft: A Closer Look Inside the European Union’s Expanding ToolboxTom RuysFelipe Rodríguez Silvestre
- Decoupling by Discrimination? Strategic Competition and the Limits of Trade LawHenrique Choer Moraes
- A Tale of Two Preemptions: The New York Convention Preempts the McCarran-Ferguson Act on Its Own MusterEmily K. Crowell
- Mutually Assured Disarmament? The Future of NATO’s Nuclear Sharing Program Under the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear WeaponsGavin M. Childers
- Textbook Resistance: Texas’ Ban on Critical Race Theory Fails the Education Standards Mandated by International LawNoah C. Nix
- LGBTQ-Inclusive Sex Education: Lessons the United States Can Learn from the United KingdomNicole D. Katapodis
- Economic Policy, Human Rights, and U.S. Action in Global Labor StandardsCaleb William Thompson
- Twenty-First Century Colonization Is Not a Good Policy DecisionEllen Elizabeth Scott
- Comparative Analysis of How Emerging Arbitration Hubs like South Korea and the U.A.E Compete for Dominance in the International ArenaOlha “Olia” Kaliuzhna
- Business and Human Rights: A Rocky Road Towards a Binding TreatyGloria María Correa
Olha “Olia” Kaliuzhna, Comparative Analysis of How Emerging Arbitration Hubs like South Korea and the U.A.E Compete for Dominance in the International Arena, 51 Ga. J. Int’l & Compar. L. 897 (2023).